The Colchester General Scandal.

This article from BBC News is, as their medical correspondant says “Truly shocking”.

Colchester General Hospital escaped ‘Special measures’ in the Keogh review even though it had worrying death rates.

Union activists have been trying to get some things changed without success but a whistleblower exposed the Trust to the Care Quality Commission – they were altering cancer patients waiting times because there are national targets that patients are seen within time limits or the trust gets into trouble.

What does management do? It fixes the figures.

I’ve (up till now) opposed the police being called in – not this time.

We’ve had ‘coding’ scandals, we have the scandal of Accident and Emergency finding tricks to avoid triggering the 4 hour time limit by keeping patients out side as long as possible or dumping patients in ward corridors.

It’s all about fixing the figures not fixing the medical problems.

This cost lives;

Nick Triggle

BBC Health correspondent

Colchester General Hospital was tampering with records, inspectors say

News that a hospital has been tampering with patient records to improve its waiting times for cancer treatment, potentially putting patients at risk, is truly shocking.

The issue is so serious that the police have been asked to investigate Colchester General Hospital.

Such a situation is unprecedented in the NHS - and as a result the temptation is to dismiss it as a one-off that should be seen in isolation.

Unfortunately, it would be complacent to do so.

What this case demonstrates is the problem inspectors have in identifying some issues in organisations as complex as hospitals.

The Care Quality Commission did not find the dodgy records. It was told where to look.

During the spring Colchester was subject to an inspection as part of the Keogh Review into mortality rates.

The review - launched after the Stafford Hospital public inquiry - investigated the 14 trusts with the highest death rates.

Problems were identified, including with the ways complaints were handled, staffing rates and leadership weaknesses, but not this.

The concerns that were identified were not even considered important enough for Colchester to be placed in special measures.

When the results of the review were announced Colchester was one of only three trusts that escaped the sanction.

But towards the end of the Keogh process a whistleblower raised concerns about the tampering of records.

This was passed on to the CQC which carried out its own inspections in August and September.

These led to Tuesday's report that showed different information was being entered into the hospital's system than was on the patients' notes so their cancer performance data looked better than it was.

The trust has now been placed in special measures and the management of the trust is being reviewed.

But to make matters worse, the trust had also carried out its own probe in early 2012 after concerns were raised by admin staff in the cancer department.

It did not identify serious problems, but the trust now accepts the issue was "not properly investigated".

The fact that concerns had been aired but not properly looked into has chilling echoes of the Stafford Hospital scandal.

Christina McAnea, head of health at Unison, whose members raised the alarm, says: "They raised their concerns repeatedly and in emails to senior managers, right up to the chief executive, but they were ignored."

Last week a review of complaints by the Labour MP Ann Clywd said the culture of "delay and denial" had to end.

The Colchester case shows just how far the NHS has to go.

Neil Harris

(a don’t stop till you drop production)

Clinicenta Update.

East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust.

Lister/Clinicenta Update.

A while ago I Blogged about the disgraceful waste of public money up at Stevenage (Private healthcare, the solution to all our problems, August 2013) where the local NHS Trust had signed a crazy PFI contract for a new ‘Hospital’ for quickie operations.

Carillion the builders were the lead supplier of the consortium. It all went badly wrong with patients dying, records lost and local Doctors refusing to refer any of their patients there for treatment.

The Care Quality Commission began proceedings to take away the Hospitals license to operate, something that hardly ever happens.

As a result the local Healthcare trust bought out the owners for £54 million pounds. I was pretty angry that these ‘entrepreneurs’ were to be bought out as it meant they couldn’t lose out, they were profiting from their own incompetance. How wrong I was;

According to this weeks ‘Private Eye’ magazine its worse than I imagined.

The contract was only for five years.

The cost of building the centre in 2011 was only £31 Million. So the incompetent Hospital consortium got £23 Million just for messing up. Then the Trust had to hire 160 nursing staff to sort out patient safety problems  at the ‘hospital’.

Clinicenta has a previous conviction – in 2011 NHS London handed these bumblers £8 Million to terminate a contract for out-of hospital care in north London.

Nice work if you can get it, this PFI.

Clean up if it works, clean up if it fails.

Neil Harris

(a don’t stop till you drop production)

Home: Helpmesortoutthenhs.blogspot.com

Vets would have made better inspectors

The Health Secretary has, today, announced that Kay Sheldon will be retained on the Board of the Care Quality Commission after the end of her term in October.

Right decision – Sheldon is a former Mental health Commissioner – that means she has a history of critically investigating what health professionals are up to, unlike most of the full-timers at the CQC, who seem to have been less well qualified for the job than I am.

Really? The investigators turned out to be firemen and retired police officers. Vets would have made better investigators.

I thought I’d reprint the ‘Daily Telegraph’ article and interview that started the whole CQC debate, back at the beginning of June. It seems a long time ago now…..I’m responsible for drastic editing, as usual.

 

 

By Laura Donnelly, Health Correspondent

Daily Telegraph Online 09 Jun 2013

Kay Sheldon, a director of the Care Quality Commission,  accused its senior managers of “deceit and evasion” in refusing to be straightforward about its failings.

She sits on the CQC’s board as a non-executive director, and her role is to hold it to account. She has now spoken out, having refused to sign a wide-ranging gagging order in the wake of attempts to have her removed by the former chairman after she gave evidence about its failings to the Mid Staffs inquiry.

She warned that key reforms being planned by the CQC to improve patient safety would come as “too little too late” and renewed questions over its willingness to acknowledge its errors that she raised at the Mid Staffs inquiry.

Mrs Sheldon was appointed to the board when the CQC was set up in 2009, having worked for one of its predecessors, the Mental Health Act Commission, as a commissioner for five years. But she became increasingly concerned about the CQC’s performance, believing that it put more effort into defending its reputation than monitoring NHS failings. Last year, in correspondence seen by this newspaper, she accused those then running the watchdog of “deceit and evasion” in their efforts to defend its failures to expose problems in hospitals and care homes.

The regulator has come under fire repeatedly for failing to act on warnings that patients were being harmed, carrying out too few inspections and placing gagging orders on staff who tried to express concerns.

MPs said last year that it was not fit for purpose, and Cynthia Bower, its chief executive, left after a critical government review of the organisation. In April, David Behan, the new chief executive, announced plans for a change of approach. Key to this is the reintroduction of national teams of experts, which were disbanded more than three years ago, despite warnings from Mrs Sheldon and senior members at the regulator.

Mrs Sheldon told The Telegraph that she feared the changes, which will not begin to take effect until October, after staff are recruited, would come too late. She warned that patients were not protected because it had taken so long for the regulator to heed warnings more than three years ago.

Although she welcomed the return of the “elite” inspection teams, she said it would take some time before the right staff were recruited, leaving the public unprotected.

“I am worried that right now the system could be unsafe. The bottom line is that getting this wrong costs lives and this is what those leading CQC need to focus on, not about whether their actions embarrass the minister or damage the reputation of an organisation.”

She added: “I am worried that the regulator has been giving false assurances that hospitals are safe, when they are not, and that could mean patients are at risk, it could mean that they are harmed and it could mean that some die, when their deaths could have been prevented.”

In 2011, Mrs Sheldon, a former trustee of Mind, the mental health charity, gave evidence to a public inquiry into the scandal of appalling care at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust, expressing “grave concerns” about the operation of the CQC and its ability to detect risk to patients.

She has now disclosed that on the same day, the watchdog’s chairman wrote to Andrew Lansley, then health secretary, demanding that she be suspended and replaced. Mr Lansley agreed, only reversing the decision last year after she threatened legal action because witnesses in public inquiries are protected in law.

Letters seen by The Telegraph disclose that lawyers for the Department of Health then attempted to put a gagging order on the deal to pay her legal costs, to which she successfully objected. She issued her warning as the CQC prepared to publish a report on its failure to prevent a series of deaths of mothers and babies in a maternity unit, despite being told of repeated concerns.

She accused regulators of trying to hide their failure to alert the public to risks to mothers and babies at University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay Foundation Trust, which had been given a clean bill of health in April 2010 even though the CQC’s regional director, Alan Jefferson, had warned of “systematic failures” which could mean further deaths.

Mr Behan has since said that the trust should not have been approved without conditions. There is to be an independent inquiry into the hospital’s failings, after a police investigation into up to 16 deaths – as well as the inquiry into the CQC. The inquiries only came about after a campaign by James Titcombe, of Dalton-in-Furness, whose son, Joshua, died in 2008 after midwives failed to treat him for an infection.

The team investigating the CQC failings has been told that in April 2010, 18 months after Joshua’s death, it unconditionally registered the hospital, giving it a clean bill of health. It was not until September 2011, after a CQC inspection, that the trust was finally warned that failings were so serious that it would be closed down if it did not make major changes. By then, its hospitals had the highest mortality rates in the country: data suggested more than 600 “excess deaths” between 2008 and 2012.

In an email to the board last July, Mrs Sheldon wrote: “The CQC line is that we responded 'robustly’ and 'uncovered the issues’. This is blatantly untrue. It is this deceit and evasion that I find so concerning, as is the board’s failure to take the issues seriously and to take appropriate action.”

She also detailed concerns about how regulators failed to expose another scandal after a series of babies’ deaths and “a culture of abuse” among midwives at Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals.

                       ========//========

Neil Harris

(a don’t stop till you drop production)

Home:    helpmesortoutthenhs.blogspot.com