Here’s another good example of what good value contracting
out services to private companies can be.
SERCO is a massive multinational, one of its contracts is
taking prisoners from police stations to courts to prisons.
If they miss a targeted delivery, if they aren’t making
enough revenue – what do they do?
They fiddle the figures.
m
It’s Ok, Boss -
I’ll Cooka Da books
Do you think I’m worried about being sued?
Oh no, I don’t think so – because they called the Feds in.
Have a look at this article from The Independent, I think the
confusing reference to £40 million is to the profits made from the contract;
Fraud
alleged in Serco prisoner escort contracts
Services
giant agrees to repay past profits from its £40m-a-year contract and forgo all
future earnings
Cahal
Milmo
Wednesday
28 August 2013
Serco, one
of Britain's largest companies, is to be investigated for fraud after the
Government and the services giant called in police to examine irregularities in
records kept for its £285m prisoner escorting contract.
Justice
Secretary Chris Grayling announced that the company has agreed to repay past
profits from its £40m-a-year contract and forgo all future earnings after an
investigation suggested records relating to the delivery of prisoners to courts
had been falsified by members of its staff.
Mr Grayling
said the review by Ministry of Justice (MoJ) officials had not found evidence
that knowledge of the alleged malpractice reached the boardroom of the company,
which last year had revenues of £4.8bn, but warned Serco that it faces being
frozen out of all future public contracts.
Serco is
one of two companies, along with G4S, which are also being investigated for
allegedly over-charging the taxpayer in the “low tens of millions” to monitor
non-existent electronic tags on prisoners, some of which had been assigned to
dead detainees.
The
Prisoner Escort and Custodial Services (PECS) contract is one of a gamut of
public sector deals held in Britain by Serco, which earns hundreds of millions
of pounds a year for providing services ranging from border controls to
managing London's cycle hire scheme.
The MoJ
said an audit of Serco's contract for transporting prisoners between court and
jails in London and East Anglia had found “evidence of potentially fraudulent behaviour”
by employees. The alleged fraud concerns the recording of prisoners having been
delivered to courts when they had not - a key measure of performance for the
contract. An audit is understood to have produced evidence that the figures may
have been manipulated to enhance performance and earnings.
Mr Grayling
said: “It has become very clear there has been a culture within parts of Serco
that has been totally unacceptable, and actions which need to be investigated
by the police.
”We have
not seen evidence of systemic malpractice up to board level, but we have been
clear with the company - unless it undertakes a rapid process of major
change... then it will not win public contracts in the future”.
Did you notice the reference to G4S?
This is SERCO’s rival in the provision of contracted out
services to the government. Their ‘tagging’ department is being investigated
for making up figures when they were claiming for work for installing
electronic tags on sentenced criminals – they were making things up too.
But it’s OK, it’s only in ‘the low tens of millions’.
Neil Harris
(a don’t stop till you drop production)
Home: helpmesortoutthenhs.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment