Showing posts with label Jeremy Hunt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jeremy Hunt. Show all posts

Sunday, 6 April 2014

Halving avoidable harm and saving 6000 lives

This is from a Department of Health press release dated 26/3/14 reporting a speech made by the Health Minister a couple of days before. I'm indebted to Carole Murphy for sending this to me - unfortunately in my own dispute with a hospital it has come 2 years too late.
 
 
Halving avoidable harm and saving 6000 lives 
 
A new ambition to reduce avoidable harm in the NHS by half over the next three years, cut costs and save up to 6,000 lives has been outlined by Jeremy Hunt. In a speech at Virginia Mason Hospital in Seattle, the Secretary of State has announced details of how NHS organisations can work together to improve patient safety and save money.
Each NHS organisation will be invited to ‘Sign up to Safety’ and set out publicly their ambitious plans for reducing avoidable harm, such as medication errors, blood clots and bed sores over the next three years. The NHS Litigation Authority, which indemnifies trusts against law suits, has agreed to review the plans and, when approved, reduce the premiums paid by all hospitals successfully implementing them. Every year the NHS spends as much as £1.3 billion on litigation claims.
The government will also introduce a Duty of Candour, making openness and honesty the norm across all health and social care organisations. It will mean providers must notify the patient about incidents where ‘significant harm’ has occurred and provide an apology.

Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said:

It is my clear ambition that the NHS should become the safest healthcare system anywhere in the world. I want the tragic events of Mid Staffs to become a turning point in the creation of a more open, compassionate and transparent culture within the NHS.
We now have a once in a generation opportunity to save lives and prevent avoidable harm – which will empower staff and save money that can be re-invested in patient care. Hospitals are already “signing up to safety” as part of this new movement - and I hope all NHS organisations will soon join them.
Hospitals are now being approached to pledge their support to the movement and all trusts will receive an invitation to join over the next few months.
Other plans to improve patient safety as part of the package include:
  • Consulting on the threshold for duty of candour to include significant harm, as part of the Care Quality Commission’s (CQC) registration requirements (as recommended by the Dalton-Williams review)
  • Recruiting 5,000 safety champions as local change agents, identifying where there is unsafe care and developing solutions to fix it
  • Creating a new Safety Action for England (SAFE) team that will consist of senior clinicians, managers and patients with a proven track record in tackling unsafe care. They will ensure that fast, flexible and intensive support is available where it is needed most
  • Launching a dedicated section of the NHS Choices website in June called ‘How Safe is my Hospital’. The online tool will give everyone the ability to compare hospitals in England across a range of patient safety indicators
  • Developing new reliable measures of avoidable hospital death rates and severe harm
A strong reporting culture, where safety incidents are reported and monitored is essential to improving safety. The measures announced today are likely to lead to an increase in the numbers of reported harm in the NHS even though care will be getting safer. NHS England will lead a project to accurately assess whether a hospital is reporting fewer, more or an expected number of incidents.
After an avoidable patient incident where a woman was accidently injected with cleaning fluid around ten years ago, Virginia Mason hospital in Seattle has turned itself around to become one of the safest hospitals in the world.

Virginia Mason Chairman and CEO Gary S. Kaplan, MD said:

Patient safety is our number one priority. We’re honored that the Health Secretary is advancing changes in England’s health system based in part on the value he sees in our commitment and dedication to always putting patients first.

Background information

  1. In a consultation on the Duty of Candour, published today, it is proposed that the Care Quality Commission (CQC) will include the Duty of Candour as part of its registration requirements. This will mean every organisation registered with the CQC will have to be open about all cases of significant harm including death, severe harm and moderate harm, including prolonged psychological harm.
  2. Virginia Mason hospital in Seattle employs more than 5,600 people and includes a 336-bed acute-care hospital; a primary and specialty care group practice of more than 460 physicians
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

Lewisham campaign victory - for now.


 

 

This was a very welcome email in my inbox this morning, cheered me up no end. Except of course, Hunt has already indicated that he will now change the law to allow him to do just this. But for now;

 

 

Robin Priestley - 38 Degrees <action@38degrees.org.uk> 

38 Degrees

Dear friend,

 

Great news just in. Health Minister Jeremy Hunt has been beaten in court ... AGAIN!

 

In August, a judge ruled that Hunt had acted illegally by deciding to cut A&E and maternity services at Lewisham hospital. Hunt appealed the decision, and today he lost again. The court of appeal ruled that he does not have the power to implement cuts at the successful hospital. [1]

 

It’s the result we’d all been hoping for, and is wonderful news for the people of Lewisham and the 38 Degrees members who chipped in to help fund the legal challenge.

 

 When the Save Lewisham Hospital campaign decided to take Jeremy Hunt to court, thousands of us from all across the UK stepped in to help. Together, chipping in whatever we could afford, we raised the £20,000 they needed to launch their legal challenge. [2]

 

This isn’t just great news for Lewisham though, it’ll show Hunt he can’t break the law and get away with it. If he’d have got away with cutting services here, then no hospital would have been safe.

 

 Rosa Curling from law firm Leigh Day, who represented the Save Lewisham Hospital Group said: "We are absolutely delighted with the Court of Appeal's decision today. It confirms what the Save Lewisham Hospital campaign has been arguing from the start - that the Secretary of State did not have the legal power to close and downgrade services at Lewisham Hospital."

 

"This expensive waste of time for the government should serve as a wake up call that they cannot ride roughshod over the needs of the people.” [3]

 

So lets make sure we remember the Save Lewisham Hospital campaign’s victory and everyone who’s given a helping hand along the way. This is an exciting day for our campaign to save our NHS. And while the battle’s not over yet, it’s important to celebrate the victories we have.

 

It’s moments like this that make it even more important that we stop the government from silencing ordinary people with the gagging law. It reminds us of the important role that campaign groups and charities play, keeping the government in check and campaigning on issues that are important. That's why we're so focussed on defeating it! [4]

 

But we’re still keeping you under observation Jeremy!

 

 Thank you for everything you do

 

 Robin, Blanche, Ian and the 38 Degrees team

 

 

 PS: Why not forward this email to your friends, it’s great to spread the good news. Today’s victory shows that people power works, and that’s an incredibly important story to tell.

 

Neil Harris

(a don’t stop till you drop production)
Home: helpmesortoutthenhs.blogspot.com

Wednesday, 9 October 2013

Crosby, Hunt and Burnham.


I detect the hand of Lynton Crosby again – the prime minister’s Australian election strategist with a few skeletons in his cupboard.

Last week the health secretary, Jeremy hunt, accused his Labour predecessor Andy Burnham of ordering the Care Quality Commission to ‘bury’ a critical report into care standards at Basildon and Thurrock NHS Trust. At the same time some selective e-mails from the CQC were released to a Tory M.P.

Burnham bit back at the weekend – he pointed out that he had launched the enquiry into Basildon amongst others and demanded a retraction – then he threatened to sue.

Now the Cabinet secretary has apologised about the release of the e-mails which breached Civil Service guidelines and Hunt has sent a letter to Burnham saying that he never meant to suggest Burnham was “personally involved in covering up poor care” and did not doubt his rival’s integrity. (I took that from The Guardian, it’s their description rather than mine).

All the press stories went out, the minister’s tweet is still up there but there has been a mealy mouthed retraction of sorts, not amounting to an apology.

I doubt Burnham will sue – it’s a lot of wasted time and money. My view is that neither of them has anything to be proud of and that we are unlikely to ever find out what was really going on.

Meanwhile, some time ago I promised to review the frontrunners for the coming vacancy at the top of the NHS – something else we won’t be consulted over – I will do that in the next few days, while trying to avoid the lawyers myself.

Neil Harris

(a don’t stop till you drop production)