My Lewisham contacts have forwarded this warning from ‘Open
Democracy’, about Government attempts to make it much easier to shut Hospitals
and departments. They moving the goalposts.
Of course, the real power is peoples and workers solidarity –
it’s always amazing how helpful the law becomes when it is faced with a major
popular campaign:
UK
Government to make it easier to shut hospitals without full consultation
Caroline
Molloy 16 October 2013
The
government is trying to push through a last minute change to the law to make it
far easier to shut down A&E departments and hospitals aross the country
without full consultation.
The
government is trying to push through a last minute change to the law to make it
far easier to shut down A&E departments and hospitals without full
consultation.
Amendments
tabled yesterday to the Care Bill - due to have its third reading in the Lords
on Monday - give the government or Monitor the right to order any hospital they
like to ‘reconfigure’ - in other words, close
- with little consultation, to benefit neighbouring struggling
hospitals.
The move
comes after Jeremy Hunt’s failed in his attempt to hastily close much of
Lewisham Hospital and redirect its patients to neighbouring South London
hospitals in financial difficulties. Campaigners succesfully defeated the plan
in the High Court in July, where Hunt's actions were ruled unlawful. In a
letter to peers yesterday, health minister Lord Howe said that the amendments
aim to ‘put beyond doubt’ that such closure moves by Hunt - anywhere in the
country - would in future be lawful.
Louise
Irvine, head of the Save Lewisham Hospital campaign, said
“This Government are making profound changes
to the law on the hoof to enable them to bully through hospital closures in
Lewisham and around the country without the need to consult properly and
thoroughly.
“The
amendment to the Care Bill they're trying to drive through at great speed,
gives them unlimited powers to destroy any hospital, in any geographical area
regardless of how successful it is, or how desperately needed it is by that
community.
“It is very
dangerous indeed if politicians quite deliberately sweep away the checks,
balances and full consultation processes that are needed in current legislation
to restructure and reduce health services for the population.”
South
London Healthcare Trust was the first hospital to be put into administration, a
process that means closure decisions can be taken without the normal level of
public consultation required. Under the 'administration' procedure, closures
can take place in less than 6 months, rather than having to go through a full
public consultation process which takes around 2 years.
Many
commentators observed that the Lewisham move seemed designed mostly to keep
South London’s ‘Private Finance Initiative’ debt repayments flowing to private
investors at all costs - even if that cost was the downgrading of a
neighbouring, financially successful hospital without PFI debts. If the
government succeeds in changing the law at the eleventh hour, even those
hospitals not carrying huge PFI debts could be sacrified - across the country -
to redirect patients to those which are.
The
£20billion of budget cuts, £3billion cost of reorganisation, and costs of
running a market, means the NHS is struggling to afford to keep hospitals open
and staffed safely. NHS establishment figures are increasingly vocal in calling
on the public to accept that hospitals must close or downgrade as a result,
though the publicly remains strongly opposed to closing local hospitals.
Hunt is
still trying to appeal his defeat over Lewisham hospital - an appeal will be
heard later this month. Richard Stein, lawyer for the Lewisham campaigners,
accused the government of " trying to move the goalposts…The Government no
doubt hope to have the new draconian powers in place so they can use them to
impose the cuts on Lewisham Hospital if they are forced by the court to
reconsider.”
David
Babbs, head of 38 Degrees said the government was “trying to sneak through a
law which allows them to force through cuts even if local doctors don't agree.
It is totally unacceptable and goes against all of the governments assurances
that they want services controlled locally.”
It seems
the government - which no longer has a full legal responsibility to secure a
comprehensive healthcare service, following last year’s Health & Social
Care Act - nonetheless still wants the right to interfere and impose unpopular
closure decisions without having to go through the inconvenience of an
extensive local consultation.
The move
was condemned by Lord Phil Hunt, shadow health spokesman in the Lords, as
‘outrageous’.
Neil Harris
(a don’t stop till you drop production)
No comments:
Post a Comment